Church-Turing thesis: Difference between revisions

From Complexity
(Created page with "{{intuition-to-formalism bridge thesis}} ==Statement== The '''Church-Turing thesis''' states that if a computation can be effectively carried out by some machine, then it can b...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:44, 28 December 2011

Template:Intuition-to-formalism bridge thesis

Statement

The Church-Turing thesis states that if a computation can be effectively carried out by some machine, then it can be carried out by any of these equivalent machines or formalisms:

  1. Turing machines
  2. lambda-calculus
  3. recursive definition

Note that (1)-(3) are known to be equivalent in terms of the power of things they can express and compute. What the Church-Turing thesis states is that any thing that can be effectively calculated is equivalent to all of these.

The Church-Turing thesis is a thesis that bridges between an intuitive notion of effective computability and a formal model of computation. It cannot be proved in this form, because the intuitive notion of effective computability has no prior formal definition. However, if a reasonable notion of effective computability is postulated that cannot be carried out by a Turing machine, then that would disprove the Church-Turing thesis.